Saturday, July 31, 2010

Speed

Speed has been sitting by my bed for ages now, and I have finally got around to watching it. I don't think words can explain how much I love Sandra Bullock as an actress. She is just such a lovely person.
It seems like just another day, but it isn't. A young policeman, Jack Travens (Keanu Reeves), must save the lives of many passengers on a bus because the bus will explode if it goes under 50mph. When the bus driver gets shot, Jack must put his trust into a young woman, Annie (Sandra Bullock) to keep driving the bus until they can get out safely.
This movie was so easy to enjoy, which is amazing for me because I'm not a huge fan of adrenaline rush action movies. Nor am I a hige fan of Keanu Reeves, who is less than fabulous in this movie. But I forgot about that pretty soon, because it wouldn't matter who was in this film: it would still be bloody entertaining.
I guess now I'll be pretty paranoid about going in buses. The movie just lets the viewer go with the flow, even though some of the things that are happening in it are totally unbelievable. And then there is Sandra Bullock, who is completely wholesome and easy to relate to.
I can't really say much more other than I really enjoyed this movie, and could watch it any time. After watching it, I felt as high as a kite.

A fantastic adrenaline rush movie.
8/10

The Hurt Locker

Upon watching The Hurt Locker, I realised that I had watched every movie nominated for Best Picture this year apart from the actual winner. So all this time I have kinda been fuming over the fact that my favourites Inglourious Basterds, District 9 and Up in the Air didn't even get a look in, but I had never actually seen the film that beat them.
The Hurt Locker follows the story of an elite Army bomb squad who are centered in Iraq. Everything they do is done with extreme care as everything and everyone are potential threats and enemies. William James (Jeremy Renner) has seen a lot of bomb disposals in his time, and has found out that war and adrenaline are drugs to him. But while he is off at war, he has a family back home. Does he love war more than that?
I can see why this movie won Best Picture. It is, for once, an interesting look at the war in Iraq. Because of it's tough topic, bomb disposal, it has a lot of adrenaline, which is helped by some fantastic direction from Kathryn Bigelow. She makes the film in a way that draws the viewer in to what's happening. Too often I found myself lost in it's world because of this.
The performances are pitch perfect, especially from Jeremy Renner, who exudes greatness as the tough guy James. Anthony Mackie, also, delivers an underrated performance as Sanborn. Even Brian Geraghty is great, and I have already forgotten him in Open House. The cameos from Guy Pearce and Ralph Fiennes don't detract from the film as many other cameos do, and they just fit in so well. It's hard to picture this movie as a movie, because we have become so used to films so dumb and flat, whereas this acts like a real-life piece that could have been filmed as a documentary in Iraq.
It sure is a great film with shattering direction from Kathryn Bigelow; her direction is enough to match twenty men, and I found it so hard to believe that a woman was directing this; however, I didn't enjoy it nearly as much as Inglourious Basterds, District 9 or Up in the Air. I do think it was better than Avatar, though. The film will probably go down in history as one of the best portrayals of war in Iraq.

A masterful war film with some amazing direction from Kathryn Bigelow. A definite must-see.
8/10

Friday, July 30, 2010

Happy Birthday Christopher Nolan!

I take a short break from trying to catch up on my blogging to just tell y'all that it's Christopher Nolan's birthday today!! (30/07) Funny thing was, this day, exactly two years ago, I first saw The Dark Knight. And tomorrow night I plan to have a Christopher Nolan movie marathon (Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, Memento and The Prestige. Cannot wait.) So yeah. It's pretty obvious that I love Christopher Nolan. I look up to him as if he weren't a director, but he is a creator. An inventor of marvellously original and mind boggling movies that seem to be lacking in this day and age. In fact, I don't see his movies as movies, I see them more as creations or masterpieces that are there for everyone to admire. Especially me.
Some people may think I am crazy when I overload my Facebook profile with Christopher Nolan babblings, but that's just how it is with me. When I love something, I'll tell everyone about it. And right at this moment I love Christopher Nolan. He's definitely what I aspire to be. Even if I do live down here in little old Dannevirke in New Zealand, which doesn't really give me the kick start to being a master like him.

So Happy Birthday, Christopher Nolan. I imagine you are having a great one with all that money you're getting from Inception (I am dying to see that movie again). May you're great movies continue for years to come. Because, after all, you are God!

Daybreakers

Vampires are very 'in' at the moment. But I see the vampire genre in the same sorta light as how it was during the Great Depression when every second movie had a song and dance in it to 'cheer people up'. Now it seems that a lot of movies have to use supernatural creatures to keep the interest factor going on. Daybreakers, is of course, about vampires. But instead of taking the easy road of a human/vampire love affair, this shows us an entirely new world: a world run by vampires.
The year is 2019, and almost the entire human race has been wiped out as most of them have become vampires. But because most of the world are vampires, there is a shortage of humans which means a shortage of blood. So what do they do when there isn't a single drop left? Edward Dalton (Ethan Hawke), a vampire, teams up with a group of humans to try and solve this issue.

The movie has a fantastic concept which has come at the right time...it's an actual vampire 'horror' as opposed to a vampire romance. However, this film is a little short on it's delivery, which is a shame, because it could have been so much. I really did enjoy it, and revelled in it's originality and thought put into how the world would be if it were run by vampires.
The biggest problem I had was the fact that the effects were very I Am Legend. I am not really a huge fan of that film and see it as one of the worst CGI failures I have ever seen. The film too often allows itself to go down the same road as I Am Legend, and wastes it's great premise on shock value and harsh truths that the world may change one day as we know it. Also, Ethan Hawke seemed a little withdrawn from his role. Hey, I know he is a vampire and he's supposed to be dead and all, but he didn't bring any life to his role at all.
This is a great film to come out of Australia filled with a fantastic veteran cast that includes Sam Neill and Willem Dafoe. It is wildly entertaining, but unfortunately let me down emotionally and effectively.

An original horror, but doesn't quite live up to it's premise.
6/10

(500) Days of Summer

Of course, this is a rewatch. Check out my original and real review here.

However, because I am so behind in my blogging and seriously don't have a lot of time to catch up, here's a video review I did back in April for Youtube. Yes, that's me, but I don't have the same hideous hair, thank the lord.




Sorry, the quality is pretty crap, but this was my first time in doing something like this. It's not like I am auditioning for the Rotten Tomatoes show or anything.

Thursday, July 29, 2010

So I went to go and see Inception again...

Instead of doing another review, because I only did one just a few days back, I'm just going to share a few things that I loved about the movie:

Complicatedness: If you have seen the movie you will understand what this thing means. But this looks a little bit like what me and my friend drew up on the whiteboard during Maths. We do work, I promise. But Inception hasn't left any of our minds yet. Sorry Maxine, Megan and Kieran, but this was not my fault.

Music: I thought 'Mind Heist' was epic, but the music in the movie was amazing! Especially 'Time' by Hans Zimmer, which is played at the end. Listen to this, and you will want to see the movie again. It hurts me to listen to it, because I don't think I'll get to see it again until it's released on DVD, but it's addictive.


Spinning top: Such a significance to the movie. I totally want one! A 'totem', that is. Damn you Dom Cobb, I want that spinning top!


Tom Hardy: The funniest guy in this movie. This guy is such a talented actor, and makes the role of Eames one to remember. I will definitely be digging up Bronson and other such films this guy has been in. Everything he said got a laugh from the audience. And I want to be a 'forger' just like him.


Joseph Gordon-Levitt: Beast. Absolutely loved him in this movie. Arthur is my favourite character out of the movie, and JGL's extreme good looks only make it better. I want to marry this guy. But I know that will never happen.

Arthur and Eames: I love the end of this clip!! It's the best quote ever!! Me and my friends cracked up when Eames said this! And Arthur's face!


Christopher Nolan: I am still in shock. I wonder how this one guy made this whole film up entirely from his imagination. Really, he could be just a director who never wears a tee-shirt but looks oh-so-superior in that suit, but he is a genius. More genius than Einstein.


I could not only completely enjoy it, but I also felt fulfilled by what it had achieved in just over two hours: In other words, I loved it.

I really want to go and see Inception again. And this post is dedicated to my chums Maxine, Megan and Kieran, who have put up with me harping on about this for months and coming to see it with me. They say they totally loved it. And for once, I know they're not lying just to keep my cinematic side happy=)

Week #2 in summary...! I think you know what rocked my world this week...Inception!

Just so you know, the whole 'Out of the Preview Drawer...' category has gone out the window because the previews are dwindling down to nothing. Sorry. And I am rewatching more than one movie a week. That is not my fault. And sorry that the posts have been late, but things are complicated on the internet front.
What did I watch this week?


  • Pan's Labyrinth (2006) A freaky horror/fairytale that scared the crumbs out of me. But not my Mum. 8/10

  • Valentine's Day (2010) It has more stars than the heavens above but this is a pretty mediocre story about the day of love. Cool rhyme, huh? Probably cooler than the movie was. 5/10

  • Crazy Heart (2009) Jeff Bridges in his Oscar winning role. He was bloody good in this movie, too. But the rest of the movie didn't fare quite so well. 6/10

  • Memento (2000) Rewatched. This, until the day after, was my favourite film of all time. But then, you know, I saw another great Nolan film...10/10

  • Inception (2010) The worst movie of the year. Just joking!! Favourite movie of all time!! And the day I first saw it may have been the greatest day of my life!! 10/10

  • 42nd Street (1933) Returning to my old movie roots. This time with a brilliant musical from the days of the Great Depression. 7/10

  • Match Point (2005) Woody Allen. Why did I even bother with this film? And why do I keep going back to watch Woody Allen movies?! 4/10

Okay seven films in seven days...that's more like it. Pretty mediocre week, but oh, there was INCEPTION!! That movie changed my life!

Best movie?? Inception. Duh. Christopher Nolan has the brains of 50million geniuses.

Worst movie?? Match Point, it would seem this week.

Next weeks post coming soon!

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Match Point

Date: 24/07/10. Average Saturday.

I genuinely dislike Woody Allen. But I just can't keep myself from watching his films. Match Point is pretty much on the same level as Vicky Cristina Barcelona and Whatever Works for me. I didn't really like either of them. I don't think I get what message Woody Allen is trying to get across, because his 'romantic comedies' suck more than the normal ones do.
A tennis player, Chris Wilton (Johnathan Rhys-Meyers) is at a turning point in his life. He marries a rich young woman, Chloe (Emily Mortimer), but he falls for a glamourous young American woman, Nola (Scarlett Johansson). Problem is, she is going out with his best friend and brother-in-law Tom (Matthew Goode).
People seem to like this the most out of all of Allen's recent works, but I can't really see why. And I know somebody will want to shoot me when I say this, but this movie was extremely stereotypical, totally miscast and stupid. The ending was really stupid. But you know, some of you are into that stuff and I don't hate you for that. Johnathan Rhys-Meyers was less than impressive in the lead role, though he was a good choice for the role. He just didn't deliver as was expected of him, and the role should have been passed on to someone who could have deliviered the goods. Johansson was, well, just the same in this movie, but proved to be quite good as the sort of femme fatale. Unfortunately, I didn't care much for her character. Emily Mortimer was average, but her character turned into a bit of a stereotypical clingy and horrible wife.
All in all, I didn't really get the point of Match Point, or how much tennis had to do with it. Because I thought this was going to be about tennis and romance. But it wasn't.

I don't like Woody Allen. I don't like this movie.
4/10

42nd Street

Date: 23/07/10. Still recovering from Inception.

I watched 42nd Street probably two years ago, and it has been gathering dust in my DVD collection ever since. I got it during my obsession with older films. But this film seems different the second time 'round, probably because I wasn't great at watching movies in my younger days...or rating them.
A young woman trying to become an actress, Peggy Sawyer (Ruby Keeler), auditions to be a chorus girl in a major travelling production. She gets into the show, and is introduced to a world of exhaustion and rehearsals that never seem to end. Meanwhile, the shows star, Dorothy Brock (Bebe Daniels) breaks her ankle the night before the show starts, and Sawyer gets forced into the lead role. But can she do it on such short notice.
I still dearly love 42nd Street, but I must admit, I could see a lot of flaws in this film. It's not your typical run-of-the-mill musical which came out during the depths of the Depression to cheer everyone up, which is a good thing. But the films best asset: the amazing dance numbers choreographed by Busby Berkeley, are also one of it's biggest problems. Those are the highlights, and the rest of the film falls quite flat. Also, if you were actually watching the stage show, those dances would have sucked because you wouldn't have been able to see the formations going on...they required a birds eye view shot to see it. However, it entertainingly squanders through it's short running time with a stand out performance from Ginger Rogers. It is a great example of how much better musicals were back in those days, compared to now.

A nice musical, albeit flawed, but charmingly entertaining.
7/10

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Inception

Date: 22/07/10. Inception Day, need I say more.
I have watched a lot of movies in my lifetime. Some have been terrible, and others have led me to believe that they are the best creations on Earth. Inception, however, is the first film where I have burst out crying during the credits because it was so amazing. It's the first film I have watched that has been so original it is unbelievable. Mostly, it is the first film that has left me frozen, or stunned, for hours after watching it. I cannot even begin to try and describe how amazing this film is.
Okay, I'm not even going to try and explain the plot. Do me and yourself a favour and go and see the film. Then you try and explain what went on this movie within the logistics of a blog post. All I can tell you is that it's about dreams. Not the soppy types you see in movies starring Sandra Bullock.
You may be wondering why I started crying when the credits started rolling. I had been crying at all the sad bits towards the end, but when the film ended I just started crying uncontrolably. For the life of me, I can't say why this was, but it probably had something to do with the fact that this film blew my mind in a way that no other film ever has. There is so much going on in this film, but it's fair to say I got most of what was going on. Though I know I'll certainly be going back for a second watch. The thing I can't get over though is how clever and original this film is. We have become so used to a world of popcorn flicks which are dumbed down to the lowest common denominator, but Inception is smart, even though it is still easy to follow.
Christopher Nolan has truly outdone himself here. This is better than everything he has ever made. I still can't believe he, one man, did it all himself. I just wanna know what he puts in his porridge at the moment. Despite the many characters in this film, each actor performs to the best of their ability, with Leonardo DiCaprio supplying a fabulous lead and Joseph Gordon-Levitt being the stand out of the supporting cast.
This could have been a simple blockbuster, but no, it is so much more than that. My advice to you is: go and see this film. Pay close attention to everything, not that that should be hard. When you come out of the cinema, you will be left speechless, frozen, amazed...I couldn't even eat after seeing this and my stomach still hurts. It runs through it's long running time like you wouldn't believe. Trust me, you will learn more from this film then you have ever learnt from school.
The best thing about this movie is that it causes you to question the line between dreams and reality. Like right now, I could be dreaming, but I would never know. That's the beauty of this film. If it doesn't get Oscars for Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Original Screenplay, then someone is going to have to die. And to all you critics who gave it less than 8/10, you should be ashamed of yourselves. This is the best film to come out in years. And it has jumped straight up to be my favourite movie of all-time.

Inception restores faith in movies, with it's fabulous scenes and amazing originality. I still can't describe how amazing it is because I am in shock.
10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000/10

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

REWATCH: Memento

Date: 21/07/10. I get to see Inception tomorrow!!!!!!

Check out my original review here.
Even though Memento has been cruelly classified as 'unavailable' here in New Zealand, I have managed to find it. First on youtube, and now I bought the DVD over an internet auction site. Thank the lord. Memento is pretty much my favourite movie of all time. And I'm not just saying that because I worship Christopher Nolan. Memento is a truly beautiful film which puts truth into the saying 'films are art'. This movie is like that painting which you can't quite understand at first glance, but if you look into it a bit more, then you definitely will get it.
As you probably know, Memento is set in backwards chronological order, with some black and white scenes in chronological order intertwined within the story. It follows Leonard Shelby (Guy Pearce), a man with 'Anterograde Amnesia'--a disorder which causes him to have short term memory loss, who is trying to find the killer of his wife and seek revenge. The way he remembers facts is by tattooing them on his body and taking photos and writing notes. But can he really be sure that the information he has written down will guide him to the right place?
This is the beauty of the movie: you, like Leonard, don't know much about anything and you are relying on the facts he is getting. But you, as the viewer, have an advantage: you can see other facts which are crucial to Leonard's investigation but he misses because of his condition. The way it is made is genius. Had this been in normal order it wouldn't have been anywhere near as good. Also, because it is done in this way it is a lot easier to relate to Leonard and his condition.
For this to become my favourite movie of all time wasn't a hard decision. I just love everything about it. Like the fact that everything isn't handed straight to me on my first watch, and it will probably take a few more watches to wrap my head around it (I may give the 'Beginning of the end' feature a go so I can see this in actual order). It has truly wonderful performances especially from Guy Pearce and then Carrie-Anne Moss and Joe Pantoliano in support. But, really, I admire it for the way Nolan sucks you in to Leonard's world. When I watch this film, my head starts hurting because I wonder how much it would suck if I kept losing my memory.
Like other Nolan films, the protagonist is seeking revenge over the death of a loved one, is also a genuine anti-hero who faces adversity, and has something mentally wrong with him. This is possibly one of the best examples of how a Nolan character works.

I love this movie just the same as any other Christopher Nolan flick, but because it is a low-budgeted Independent film I admire it all the more. I can't say anymore than that.
10/10




Crazy Heart

Date: 20/07/10. Just another day at school. With more homework than ever before.

Like The Blind Side, Crazy Heart is made worthwile thanks to an amazing performance from it's Oscar winning lead, in this case Jeff Bridges. Sandra Bullock lifted the drivel of The Blind Side and Jeff Bridges did exactly the same for Crazy Heart. Had Jeff Bridges not been so great in this movie, it would have fallen flat on it's face, literally.
Bad Blake (Jeff Bridges) was once a prized country singer, but has faded into the world oof working so hard for money but never getting very far. He meets a young single mother journalist, Jean Craddock (Maggie Gyllenhaal), who causes Blake to reassess what he wants to do with his life, while also inspiring him to reincarnate his career.
This movie is a hard one to describe. I can see why it is so critically acclaimed, but for the more mainstream audience this is extremely American because of it's country music themes and also is very flat in the way of story. No to say that is a bad thing, because right from the very start I could tell this was mainly an acting showcase for Jeff Bridges and maybe also Maggie Gyllenhaal, who delivers a fantastic Oscar nominated performance.
I admire it for it's beauty and slow pace which makes for quite an easy viewing. Also it's use of music which I guess will make country music fans smile. But, despite my best efforts, I became a little bored with it. Had it not been for Jeff Bridges who was captivating from start to finish, I may have been tempted to turn the movie off.

A perfect Oscar film, with a fantastic performance from Bridges, but unfortunately lacks the magic factor.
6/10

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Valentine's Day

Date: 19/07/10. First. Day. Of. School. Need I say more?

It's really hard to believe, but in February, Valentine's Day was like my Inception. I admit, I didn't want to watch it as much as I want to watch Inception, but, you get the point, I was really excited about this one. Why? Because, you know, it has such a great cast. How is it possible that this movie could contain Jessica Alba, Kathy Bates, Jessica Biel, Bradley Cooper (*sighs*), Eric Dane, Patrick Dempsey, Hector Elizondo, Jamie Foxx, Jennifer Garner, Topher Grace, Anne Hathway, Ashton Kutcher, Queen Latifah, Taylor Lautner, George Lopez, Shirley MacLaine, Emma Robert, Julia Roberts and Taylor Swift?! Usually, a cast like this would be the recipe for success. It's a shame they didn't warn me that each cast member came with lots of sugar, therefore making this the recipe for candy that is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too sweet, it's sickening.
The title pretty much says it all: this movie is about intertwining couples and singles in Los Angeles and what they do on Valentine's Day.
This movie is like every other romantic comedy. At this point in time, I think its almost impossible to even try and reinvent the genre because everything they do is so cliched. While watching this, I was thinking 'this has more twist and turns than a Christopher Nolan movie...shame I could see every twist coming.' Not that I would ever confuse this with a Christopher Nolan movie, that is a bit of an insult. There are so many stories, its hard to keep track of them all, and because of all the characters there is absolutely NO room for character development, which is one huge problem because every character is extremely stereotypical. The script is particularly unfunny, and you can tell this by the fact that the 'funny one-liners' which should be getting laughs actually come across as awkward silences.
If anything, I still enjoyed parts of this movie to a certain point. I still love Anne Hathaway even though she was bad in Alice in Wonderland and this film doesn't exactly do wonders for her career. The other members of the cast were still okay, mainly because you could tell that they new what they were doing in this film: not a lot. And I've always had a weakness for chick flicks.

Doesn't make Valentine's Day look like a fantastic day. I'm still recovering from the sugar overdose.
5/10

Monday, July 19, 2010

Pan's Labyrinth

Date: 18/07/10. Last day of holidays.

Ever since Pan's Labyrinth first came out in late 2006 I had wanted to see it. Reason why I didn't? Ask the video store. Now I have my hands on this, I can tell that I won't want to be watching this film just once, it's a good enough fairytale to keep revisiting.
Just like a classic fairytale, Ofelia (Ivana Baquero) escapes to a land full of mythical creatures and things she wouldn't normally find in the real world. She goes to this place when she is sent to live with her mother to her evil stepfather's during WWII in Spain. Upon going there, she finds out that she is the long lost princess, but to prove her royalty she must complete a set of very gruesome task If she doesn't do this then she won't be able to see her real father again.
What I loved most about Pan's Labyrinth was the fact that it takes a simple fairytale and turns it on its side to reveal a much darker, horrifying view of it. Most of its violence and gore contributes to the beauty of it. The creatures in this film are entirely believable, and don't seem like those weird things that you can tell just came from someones head without much thought being put into them (like Tim Burton's CGI disaster version of Alice in Wonderland. Not cool.)
The content of this film is very metaphorical and captivating. It's just another example of how European's can produce much better quality horror films than the crap that sick minds in America like to churn out. Though it doesn't seem like a horror film on the surface, this gave me nightmares.

A fairytale not the way we are used to seeing it. Beautiful.
8/10

Sunday, July 18, 2010

Week #1 in summary...! Bats, Planes and Gollum rock my world this week.

This week has been an average week for my cinematic mind to come into full force. Let's just take a look back on what I watched:

  • The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002)--"Classics...I haven't seen yet". The second installment to that fantastic film series by Peter Jackson. Who, you know, is from New Zealand. 8/10
  • Remember Me (2010)--"New Releases". That ending. I mean, they keep talking about that ending in Inception and I sure hope that it isn't as offensive as this one. I hate you R-Pattz. 4/10

  • Following (1998)--"Classics...I haven't seen yet". Christopher 'I have just conquered the world' Nolan's first film, which had a $6,000 budget. That is groundbreaking. 7/10

  • The Men who Stare at Goats (2010)--"New Releases". The Cloon, that guy from Moulin Rouge!, Spacey and Hippie Bridges get together for a movie as weird as it sounds. Oh, and I forgot to mention the other top-billing star, Goat. 6/10

  • The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003)--"Classics...I haven't seen yet". Amazing. I imagine Americans get major landscape envy when they see this movie. New Zealand is so beautiful. 10/10

  • Up in the Air (2009)--Rewatch. By the end of Thursday, I had watched this film four times in one week. It is truly amazing. 10/10

  • The Dark Knight (2008)--Rewatch, but not Re-reviewed. Hands down one of the greatest films I have ever seen. Christopher Nolan knows how to crack into my brain. 10/10

  • Black Dynamite (2009)--"Out of the Preview Drawer..." My first taste of Blaxploitation. And probably my last. Still, I wish when I entered the room some cool theme music like "DY-NA-MITE! DY-NA-MITE!" went off! 6/10

  • Open House (2010)--"Out of the Preview Drawer..." Anna Paquin is not the lead in this film!! She is in it for five minutes!! This is like, one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Even if Bill Compton, er, I mean, Stephen Moyer is in it. 2/10

  • Love Happens (2009)--"New Releases". Despite the boringness and the Jennifer Aniston-ness of this movie, I still love Aaron Eckhart. 4/10

So that was 10 movies in 7 days. Even though this exercise is called 'A Movie a Day...' This week movies have averaged at 6.7/10. So I guess I could call that 'average'.

Best movie? Definitely The Dark Knight. But if we were talking films I haven't seen, then The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.

Worst movie? Open House. Horrible, horrible movie. Even if it is independent and went to Tribeca, that doesn't disguise the fact that it has no character development.

Highlight of the week (non-A Movie a Day... related): Seeing normal audiences raving over Inception. I know I am going to love it.

Lowlight of the week: Seeing negative Inception reviews, not getting to see Inception when everyone else does, and the fact that the school holidays are almost over. Crap.

Love Happens

Date: Still 17/07/10. Just three hours at work today.

Jennifer Aniston+Love Happens=Meh. I'm sick of soppy romances which practically have no point to even be in existence. Saying this makes me feel kinda sad, because even though I didn't really like this movie, it still has Aaron Eckhart in it who I really love.
Burke Ryan (Aaron Eckhart) is a man who's wife died and then wrote a self-help book about overcoming grief. Ever since then he tours America doing workshops for people who need help in the same area. On one of these trips to Seattle, he bumps into hotel florist Eloise (Jennifer Aniston), who he falls for instantly. This causes Burke to admit that he hasn't really confronted the truth behind his wife's passing.
Okay, so it wasn't the worst way to spend 104 minutes. Mainly because of Aaron Eckhart. But he seemed a little withdrawn from his role and his usual charisma is lacking. That probably has something to do with the fact that he knows what kind of film this is and doesn't make much of an effort to make it any better. His talents are more reserved to films like The Dark Knight, films like that he should be starring in more often. Jennifer Aniston is exactly the same in this as she is in any other film she has been in post-Friends. Will the day ever come when she stars in something that barely puts her in a romantic situation?
The movie, as a whole, is kind of dull. You can see that whoever made this was trying to reinvent the rom-com by putting this story into a darker context (Burke's wife dying, the grief surrounding that). Though it has a teary end, I found myself wondering, was this movie really worth crying over? The characters weren't likeable because they were both very stereotypical and bland. And the fact that Eloise kept using huge words to make herself seem smarter just highlighted the fact that there was nothing natural about it: you could tell that the actors were forcing the script out of their mouths.

Boring and shallow. But I still love Aaron Eckhart.
4/10

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Open House

Date: 17/07/10. School is so close to coming back that it hurts. I hate this time of the holidays.

Never heard of Open House? Neither had I, until I found it in the preview drawer, where the disc heralded Anna Paquin as the main star in this. Then I found out that Stephen Moyer was in it too. It would have been nice to see these two outside the world of Bon Temps and into something which is kinda real. The thing is, Anna Paquin was in the film for like five minutes (literally), said very few lines, yet still managed to be the 'main star'. Stephen Moyer was in the film for a bit longer, but not compared to the leads who deserved higher billing even more.
Alice (Rachel Blanchard) is trying to sell her home after divorcing her husband Josh (Stephen Moyer). After an open home, the house seems well on it's way to being sold. But the prospective buyer didn't leave the house, and instead holds Alice captive in her own home. The new guests make themselves at home while she tries desperately to get out.
Okay, I realize that this is Andrew Paquin's first film effort, and I can see that he has a lot of potential. But this film is terrible. So, so terrible. Everything is so poorly done. The acting, first off, is bland and I couldn't believe a word anyone was saying, nor did I care for the characters, so when they died I wasn't feeling any remorse. The gore was second rate, and the film seemed to resort to blood as a way to keep the viewer interested. And because a lot of people died, there was a lot of stupid blood and what not to put up with.
Then there was the story. This could have been an average concept, but the reason it didn't work was because there was a lack of character development. In fact, I'm sure that the people in this were just names and those names got filled with a bland actor who said everything they were supposed to say--it was like those stupid School Journal plays we used to have to do. And the complete absence of explaination behind the killers motives made it all very flat and silly. These people were killing everyone, but why? What were they trying to do?

You can see some of the potential in the director, but you best wait until he directs something better than this. It's terrible.
2/10

Black Dynamite

Date: 16/07/10. Eight hour day at work. That's all I have to say about that.

Is it just more, or do all the stupid ideas make it big in Hollywood? Blaxploitation films, though I have never seen one (I have seen examples in the documentary Not Quite Hollywood), are an interesting concept. I cannot fully explain why, but when somebody brings back a genre which hasn't been around in a while (in this case, Michael Jai White), people like it. People really liked Black Dynamite.
This is the story of 1970s African-American action legend Black Dynamite (Michael Jai White). The Man killed his brother, pumped heroin into local orphanages, and flooded the ghetto with adulterated malt liquor. Black Dynamite was the one hero willing to fight The Man all the way from the blood-soaked city streets to the hallowed halls of the Honky House...
Sounds pretty, um, weird, let's just say. I guess the enjoyment rate of this movie depends on what kind of person you are. If you liked Blaxploitation films then you will definitely love this. If you like spoof movies than you will probably like this, and I do have to admit that this is miles better than the likes of Disaster Movie or Epic Movie. If you like watching black guys kicking ass and getting the ladies then this is definitely for you. Unfortunately for me, I don't really like any of that.
This movie wasn't so bad, but it could have been better. I think it does Blaxploitation justice and introduces the genre to a younger demographic who will really get a kick out of this. But I found it a bit too silly and unbelievable.

I enjoyed parts of this movie, but it isn't really my type of thing.
6/10

Waiting's a bitch.

So pretty much everyone in America has now seen/is going to see Inception. Which just isn't fair. Because little old me down in here in New Zealand has to wait until Thursday. That isn't the only problem. I can't preorder tickets here, so I am not guaranteed to be able to get in at the 5.30pm-ish screening. Mum doesn't finish work 'til 4pm. So, basically, I have to hurry home from school, make Mum hurry home from work, get her ready, and then go to our neighbouring city, which should hopefully take 45minutes. I am really hoping that there aren't some ridiculous screenings before 5.30pm, otherwise I am going to die.

I should really stop stressing. I have five days to worry about this.

All's well though, I think I have figured out a way to preorder tickets without having to steal Dad's credit card and having him texting me every five minutes making sure I am not buying large amounts of Burger King and a few new scarves with it. That card is only the key to Inception.

Despite the fact that it is rated 83% on RT, I'm not too happy about that. The negative reviews are sounding really negative, but I am still thinking those reviewers are just jealous of Nolan's talents. They keep saying that it is too smart for it's own good. *coughs* These were the same reviewers who were looking for some smarter blockbusters. I think that the non snobby film bloggers and the genral audience all really like this movie. Okay, that's an understatement. They f**king love this movie! Because I fit into both of those categories, I know I will love this movie. I'm just worried that my expectations are way too high because I have been waiting for this movie for so long.

It has a 9.3/10 rating on IMDB, and is currently rated #83 on the Top 250. I can only imagine that this will go up in time because only around 5000 people have voted. 84.5% of whom have rated it 10/10. This is why I prefer IMDB's consensus more than RT's, because most of the people on IMDB are non film snobs. Oh, and by the way, the RT community have given it a generous 92% average.

I can not wait any longer. The teacher's will be so worried when I start having fits of excitement during class on Thursday.

If I don't get to see Inception on Thursday (above).

Friday, July 16, 2010

The Dark Knight (Rewatch?)

Okay, I have seen The Dark Knight several times before, but technically it's not a 'rewatch' because I haven't blogged about it before. So there, my 'movie a day' challenge remains intact.

As I said, I have watched The Dark Knight several times before. The first time I saw it, that was the most exciting day of my life. I watched it a few times when I got it on DVD, then I didn't watch it again for almost a year. A few weeks ago, I brought it out of my dusty DVD shelf and gave it another go. And again, as it was sitting right by my bed, I wanted to watch it again.
I sit here and wonder why I keep going back to this film. It almost seems like every time I watch it I gain something new from it...I find out something I didn't already know. But on this most recent watch, I think I may have the whole movie in the palm of my hand and that I have exhausted every single detail of the film...though can I really be sure?

This is what I love about Nolan films is that they are never that great on the first watch. Sure, they blow your mind to the extent that you will give it a full quota of stars. But to me, when I first saw it, I, like many, was blinded by the fantastic performance from Heath Ledger. So what has changed for me now?

I wouldn't say this has changed, as I was well aware of it during my first watch, but I was overpowered by it's originality. When people use the term 'superhero' movie to describe it, I can't think of anything less true. Yes, it has the central character Batman, who is perceived by many to be a superhero, but Batman is just someone who wants to make Gotham a better place. Just like people donate money to poor people, they are trying to make a difference. Just because Batman wears a cape and is insanely good at beating people up doesn't justify him to be a superhero. Superman is a superhero, hence the name. Nolan has managed to turn the tables on what Batman is supposed to be, an unfortunate image created by Tim Burton, and turned him into something completely human. With benefits.

When I first saw The Dark Knight, I had not seen Batman Begins. In fact, I had not seen Batman Begins until just recently. Call me stupid, but, when I put Knight into context through Begins I got a clearer picture. Though, that didn't necessarily make the movie any better for me.

The cast was more than just Heath Ledger. Everyone performed at their utmost best, but especially, to me, I have to praise Aaron Eckhart. Here is a truly underrated actor, who may pick some crap films (uh, Love Happens?), but manages to defy the odds as Harvey Dent. I don't know why people don't pick up on his performance more (okay, who am I kidding, everybody loved Heath Ledger, and left it at that.), because he handled the role with such polished professionalism and later disdain when Dent turns out to be the villain. Other than Eckhart, another particular standout is Maggie Gyllenhaal, who more than capably makes the role of Rachel Dawes her own. Katie Holmes was pretty weak in the role in the first film, but Gyllenhaal brings more strength to her character and fills in the blanks which Holmes was missing.

There are so many stories in this film, that all twist into one, though you don't have time to realise it. Of course, this is down to Nolan's quick editing techniques, which fit perfectly within this film because it gets so much point across in its 146 minutes, and still keeps you captivated. In the normal world, a film about Batman which last 146 minutes should be pretty boring and only focused on Batman going around saving the day and getting the girl. These two points are only minor factors in otherwise a thoroughly smart and rich take on Gotham's underbelly. That subject matter, which is actually the main point of the film, requires several stories of mobs (Salvatore Maroni's men), a villain willing to take Batman on (Joker), that villain cutting off some of Gotham's key links to cleanliness, an Attorney trying to make a change but ultimately becoming the victim of the villains nasty plan, and then of course, we have Batman trying to clean this mess up. If it wanted to be, this film could have at least been three different ones. But that would have been too easy. Nolan could handle a million films in one if he wanted to.

A lot of people died in this movie. And you know what? I usually have a problem with this. But the films massive violence and death rate makes it so much better. People get turned on by death, and most films throw this in there and it usually comes out stupid. Not this one.

Finally, the absence of CGI makes this so much more believable. That's what we need. We need to believe what we are seeing instead of believing the green screen.

When I think about The Dark Knight, I am usually greeted with fond memories of how it went straight to number one on IMDB's top 250, of how I fell in love with Heath Ledger's performance as the Joker, of how excited I was to go and see it. Then I realise that these three memories are memories which can never be replicated by another release. No film, not any film based on a comic anyway, will ever get to the heights that The Dark Knight so proudly sits on. It may, like some films, have become the victim of over hype, but this film was worth getting hyped up for. It still is. Sure, it may have made it's way down to bargain bins, but people remember it. And why is that? Because it's an almost perfect smart dark thriller, which is ambitious and has no limits. It just keeps aiming for the sky.

Favourite scene?
Either the interrogation scene, the hospital scene or the chase between the Joker in the truck and Batman's Batpod. But ultimately, I will never forget the prologue scene for starting an epic movie just how I would want it.

Favourite quote?
Harvey Dent: "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain."
The best film of the decade, no doubt about it.
10/10







Thursday, July 15, 2010

REWATCH: Up in the Air

Check out my original review here.


Up in the Air is quite possibly one of the best films to come out this year in New Zealand, but ultimately the best movie to come out last year. I don't care how great The Hurt Locker was, this should have won Oscar for Best Picture, or at least an Oscar. Upon rewatching it, for the third time in a week, I realised that Up in the Air has a rare quality that has seemed to be lost in the film industry of today: the ability to give people something to relate to.
The movie was released just at the right time, when America was in an economic crisis and people were losing their jobs left right and center. Jason Reitman, the director, obviously saw an opportunity in this, and used real people to tell their stories of being fired in the current economic climate. These people thought they were part of a documentary on the matter, but they saw themselves in a fictional movie starring George Clooney. Some claim to fame, huh?
It's hard to point out what makes Up in the Air so great. I can watch this movie over and over again and still fall in love with it. What I bring it all down to is the amazing performances from the Cloon and the two female leads: rising stars Vera Farmiga and Anna Kendrick.

Firstly, George Clooney makes Ryan Bingham, who isn't a very pleasurable character, somehow likeable. On the surface, he is a very cold and mean person, which is pretty much a characteristic you need when being in the line of work he is in: firing people for bosses who can't do it themselves. But with the Cloon's charasmatic approacch to the character, he makes this Bingham easy to relate to, and by the end, you will really feel for him (I'm not going to spoil the end for you if you haven't seen it).

Then there is Vera Farmiga, who has been a favourite of mine since her amazing support performance as Madolyn in The Departed. Alex Goran was her break through character, and I really hope that people start noticing what a fantastic actress she really is and GIVE HER AN OSCAR! (okay, I admit Mo'Nique deserved it more, but, you know...) I cannot explain how much I fell in love with Alex throughout the movie. She's just a really beautiful person, but a smartass, which is kinda cool. She was one of the biggest reasons I loved this movie.

Lastly, there is Anna Kendrick. Who? Well, you unfortunately may remember her from the Twilight 'Saga', but you won't even know its the same person. Here she plays Natalie Keener, a young college grad who is set to change the world of coporate downsizing by webcam-firing people. I think that pretty much sums her character up. She's a modern girl who's ready to teach the Cloon a few lessons.


Favourite scenes??
Well, one I will always admire for its, um, pure comedy gold, is when Natalie breaks down because her boyfriend has dumped her. And also the one where they crash the AlphaTech party and Natalie chooses a fantastic nametag: Jennifer Chu.

Favourite quotes??
Alex: "He broke up with you by text message?"
Ryan: "Wow, that's kinda like firing someone over the internet."

This is one of those movies that was far better than it's book, which is actually the story of Ryan Bingham, who still wants his 10million Frequent Flyer miles, but is going on a sort of road trip with his disturbed younger sister Julie. The book was quite popular in its heyday, but once 9/11 happened everyone went off the idea of flying, and this book. Which makes me wonder, what would Ryan Bingham have done about that situation?
I've probably said it, and I'll say it again, Up in the Air is by far one of the best movies of last year, and really should have won an Oscar, at least for it's terrific screenplay. But, in the year of Blue People and Bomb disposal in Iraq, did it ever really have a chance? This is Jason Reitman's best film, yes, even better than Juno, which will clearly stick around for a while.
10/10








LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails